Braveheart Movie: William Wallace and Historical Inaccuracies
When Mel Gibson’s Braveheart hit theaters in 1995, it quickly became an epic favorite among moviegoers, captivating audiences with its portrayal of Scotland’s struggle for independence under the leadership of William Wallace. The film’s sweeping battle scenes, impassioned speeches, and vivid depiction of medieval life earned it five Academy Awards, including Best Picture. However, while Braveheart succeeded in bringing global attention to one of Scotland's most revered figures, it did so by taking significant liberties with historical facts.
In this blog post, we’ll explore some of the historical inaccuracies in Braveheart while also honoring the movie’s contribution to the legacy of William Wallace and Scottish history.
The Real William Wallace: A Scottish Icon
William Wallace is celebrated in Scotland as a national hero, a symbol of resistance against English oppression during the Wars of Scottish Independence. Born around 1270, Wallace was a minor noble who rose to prominence as a leader of the Scottish resistance following the English invasion of Scotland. His most famous victory came at the Battle of Stirling Bridge in 1297, where his forces defeated a much larger English army, solidifying his status as a key figure in Scotland’s fight for freedom.
While Wallace’s real-life exploits are legendary, the film version of his story, while inspiring, diverges significantly from historical events.
Historical Inaccuracies in Braveheart
-
Kilts and Face Paint Perhaps the most visually iconic elements of Braveheart are the kilts worn by Wallace and his warriors and the blue face paint they don before battle. However, these elements are anachronistic. Kilts didn’t become a common part of Scottish attire until the 16th century, long after Wallace's time. The blue face paint, reminiscent of ancient Pictish warriors, was also not a practice (that we know of) in the 13th century. Wallace and his men would have worn chainmail or simple tunics, reflecting the armor and clothing of the period.
-
The Battle of Stirling Bridge The Battle of Stirling Bridge is one of the most pivotal moments in both Scottish history and Braveheart. However, the movie’s depiction of this battle is notably missing a key feature—the bridge itself. The historical battle was fought on a narrow bridge over the River Forth, which played a critical role in the Scots' victory by bottlenecking the English forces. The film’s open-field battle, while cinematically spectacular, omits this crucial tactical element.
-
Wallace’s Love Life Braveheart introduces a romantic subplot involving Wallace and Princess Isabella of France, who is portrayed as the wife of Edward II. In reality, Isabella was only a young child at the time of Wallace’s death and did not marry Edward II until years later. The romantic connection between Wallace and Isabella is purely fictional, added to create emotional depth and drama in the story.
-
The Execution of Wallace Wallace’s execution in Braveheart is depicted with considerable artistic license. While the film captures the brutality of his death, it simplifies the historical process. Wallace was captured in 1305 and brought to London, where he was tried for treason, despite never having sworn allegiance to the English crown. He was brutally executed, drawn, and quartered, but some of the specific details shown in the film, including the manner in which he shouts "Freedom!" in defiance, are dramatized for effect.
-
The Portrayal of Robert the Bruce Robert the Bruce, who would later become King of Scotland, is portrayed in the film as a conflicted and somewhat treacherous character. While Bruce did have a complex relationship with Wallace and the Scottish resistance, the film exaggerates his betrayal. In reality, Bruce was a pragmatic leader who ultimately played a crucial role in Scotland’s eventual independence.
Honoring Braveheart's Impact
Despite its historical inaccuracies, Braveheart deserves credit for revitalizing interest in William Wallace and Scottish history. Before the film’s release, Wallace was largely a figure known primarily in Scotland and among historians. Braveheart introduced him to a global audience, inspiring many to learn more about the real history behind the film. The movie’s portrayal of Wallace as a fearless leader willing to sacrifice everything for his country resonated with audiences and contributed to a renewed sense of pride in Scottish heritage.
Moreover, Braveheart has had a lasting cultural impact, influencing everything from tourism in Scotland to popular perceptions of medieval warfare. The film’s battle scenes set a new standard for epic cinematography, and its themes of freedom and resistance continue to resonate with viewers around the world.
Conclusion
Braveheart may not be a faithful retelling of William Wallace’s life, but it succeeded in something perhaps even more important: it immortalized a hero and reignited a passion for history. By acknowledging the film’s inaccuracies while celebrating its contributions, we can appreciate Braveheart as both a cinematic achievement and a cultural milestone. It reminds us that even when history is reshaped by Hollywood, the stories of courage and sacrifice that inspire us are timeless.
In the end, Braveheart did for William Wallace what few other films have done for historical figures—it made him a legend. And legends, after all, are meant to endure.
Kurt Evald Noer
Author